| Posted By |
Discussion Topic:
NTFS or Fat32? What's better?
|
|
jims |
12-18-2001 @ 9:07 AM
|
|
|
Administrator
Posts: 1
Joined: Dec 2001
|
There is an interesting article on filesystems that explains FAT, FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS nicely:
http://www.pcnineoneone.com/text/filesystems.txt
This message was edited by natef on 2-7-02 @ 10:21 AM
|
|
Webmaster |
|
12-17-2001 @ 3:14 PM
|
|
|
Administrator
Posts: 44
Joined: May 1999
|
This depends on what you need to do with the volumes. Under Windows 2000 the maximum file size and maximum partition size are as follows:
File Systems Max Partition Size Max File Size
FAT 4 Gig 4 Gig
FAT 32 32 Gig 4 Gig
NTFS 16 Exabytes 16 Exabytes
Note: 16 Exabytes equals 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 bytes
Microsoft recommends the NTFS file system because of its reliability and security advantages. While drives grow in size NTFS does not take much of a performance hit unlike FAT and FAT 32. While similar in design the FAT 32 file system is recommended over the FAT files system for use with larger drives.
|
|
Webmaster |
|
12-17-2001 @ 2:21 PM
|
|
|
Administrator
Posts: 44
Joined: May 1999
|
Should I format my array using NTFS or Fat32? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
Regards, Webmaster
|
