CEI - RAID Toolbox Support
CEI Products Press Support RAID 
Info Online 
Ordering

RaidToolBox Discussions / FAQ's - RAIDTOOLBOX / NTFS or Fat32? What's better?
login
join
search

moderated by natef  Reply to Discussion | New Discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Discussion Topic: NTFS or Fat32? What's better?

remove book mark from this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

Webmaster
12-17-2001 @ 2:21 PM                          
reply
edit
profile
Administrator
Posts: 44
Joined: May 1999
          
Should I format my array using NTFS or Fat32? What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Regards, Webmaster

Webmaster
12-17-2001 @ 3:14 PM                          
reply
edit
profile
Administrator
Posts: 44
Joined: May 1999
          
This depends on what you need to do with the volumes. Under Windows 2000 the maximum file size and maximum partition size are as follows:

File Systems   Max Partition Size   Max File Size
FAT                4 Gig                4 Gig
FAT 32          32 Gig               4 Gig
NTFS             16 Exabytes     16 Exabytes

Note: 16 Exabytes equals 18,446,744,073,709,551,616 bytes


Microsoft recommends the NTFS file system because of its reliability and security advantages. While drives grow in size NTFS does not take much of a performance hit unlike FAT and FAT 32. While similar in design the FAT 32 file system is recommended over the FAT files system for use with larger drives.

jims
12-18-2001 @ 9:07 AM                          
reply
edit
profile
Administrator
Posts: 1
Joined: Dec 2001
          
There is an interesting article on filesystems that explains FAT, FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS nicely:

http://www.pcnineoneone.com/text/filesystems.txt

This message was edited by natef on 2-7-02 @ 10:21 AM



RaidToolBox Discussions Home | Back to RaidToolbox Support | Contact the Webmaster

Copyright © 2001, 2002 - Charismac Engineering Inc.
Powered by < CF FORUM > v.2.0